**Global enterprises:** Organisations are increasingly managing tail spend—small, fragmented purchases often overlooked—to achieve significant savings, improve compliance, and boost governance. With up to 20% of indirect spend involved, smarter data-driven strategies and dedicated ownership are transforming procurement’s control over this previously neglected area.
As macroeconomic pressures increase, procurement leaders are reevaluating every facet of their expenditure, particularly the often-overlooked category known as tail spend. Traditionally deemed too complex or low-value to warrant dedicated management, tail spend is now being recognised as a strategic lever capable of unlocking savings, enhancing compliance, and reinforcing governance within organisations. It is estimated that up to 20% of indirect spend may fall into this category, prompting companies to acknowledge that even small transactions can hold considerable financial, regulatory, and reputational implications.
Tail spend is characterised by its low-value, scattered purchases that occur outside standard procurement channels. Although it can make up a significant portion of total indirect spend and involve as many as 80% of suppliers—many of whom are only utilised once—it often lacks the strategic oversight seen in core sourcing activities. Without dedicated management, businesses find themselves diminishing their bargaining power, grappling with pricing inconsistencies, and facing the risk of regulatory non-compliance. Furthermore, procurement teams may become bogged down in manual tasks, such as chasing invoices or reconciling mismatched records, rather than concentrating on higher-value initiatives.
The management of tail spend is gaining traction as organisations seek to integrate smarter strategies into their procurement processes. The initial step towards effective management is achieving visibility into purchasing patterns. By analysing spend data, companies can identify duplicate suppliers, fragmented transactions, and off-contract purchases, enabling them to take targeted action. Technology plays a critical role here; spend analytics platforms can provide insights into where money is being spent, who is spending it, and with which vendors. A study conducted by The Hackett Group indicates that implementing structured tail spend management can lead to average savings of 7.1%, potentially translating to $7 million in savings for every $100 million of unmanaged tail spend.
Several strategic approaches can unlock these savings:
-
Formalise Tail Spend as a Risk-Controlled Spend Class
Organisations are encouraged to treat tail spend as a distinct category, complete with its own policies and controls. Defining tail spend within the procurement policy and making compliance criteria, such as supplier validation and data transparency, mandatory for all purchases, can help close compliance gaps. -
Designate a Tail Spend Programme Owner
Assigning clear accountability for managing tail spend can provide the structure and focus this area often lacks. A director-level role dedicated to implementing a comprehensive tail spend strategy can facilitate collaboration across procurement, finance, and operations, pushing for adherence to new tools and compliance standards. -
Utilise Approved Marketplaces
Integrating online marketplaces with procurement systems can enable departments to purchase directly from pre-vetted suppliers. By establishing clear usage rules and approval workflows, organisations can maintain governance while allowing business units the flexibility they need. -
Consolidate Suppliers
Employing spend analytics to identify suppliers offering similar goods or services under varied terms can lead to consolidation under framework agreements. Fewer suppliers can lessen administrative burdens and enhance negotiating power. -
Implement Enterprise-Level Reporting
Constructing a reporting system that incorporates tail spend into regular discussions with finance and senior leadership can enhance visibility and accountability. Tracking metrics related to tail spend at the same level as strategic sourcing outcomes can raise awareness and garner support from management.
As procurement leaders navigate the complexities of tail spend, the challenge lies not in its size but rather in the fragmentation and lack of visibility surrounding it. With defined strategies, clear ownership, and effective utilisation of data and technology, organisations can bring this spending category to light and manage it more effectively. In doing so, companies can illustrate procurement’s strategic role, enhancing their operational resilience and maintaining discipline across the enterprise.
Source: Noah Wire Services
Subscribe to Industry Updates
