India’s latest round of diplomacy is designed to signal that it does not intend to be forced into choosing sides.
New Delhi is hosting the BRICS National Security Advisers’ meeting on 22-23 June, with National Security Adviser Ajit Doval in the chair, just days after Prime Minister Narendra Modi attended the G7 summit. According to India’s foreign ministry and reports in local and international media, the talks will focus on non-traditional security threats, the changing ...
Continue Reading This Article
Enjoy this article as well as all of our content, including reports, news, tips and more.
By registering or signing into your SRM Today account, you agree to SRM Today's Terms of Use and consent to the processing of your personal information as described in our Privacy Policy.
technology landscape and wider regional and global security issues.
The timing is deliberate. By appearing at both a Western-led forum and a gathering of BRICS states, India is reinforcing its long-held doctrine of strategic autonomy: the idea that it can work with competing power centres without becoming tied to any one bloc. For policymakers, that offers flexibility. For investors, it is meant to translate into something more practical: fewer shocks to trade, smoother access to technology and a lower risk of supply-chain disruption.
The BRICS meeting also carries broader geopolitical weight. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi is expected in India for the event, underlining the continued importance of bilateral engagement even amid wider rivalry. Discussions are set to cover counter-terrorism, information security, cyber risks and the role of emerging technologies in national security, reflecting how the agenda has expanded well beyond traditional defence questions.
India’s approach is not without risk. A worsening external environment can still lift oil prices, widen the import bill and add pressure to inflation. Currency volatility remains a concern, as do possible restrictions on technology transfers and shifts in global trade rules. But the government’s aim is clear: keep channels open with both advanced economies and the Global South, and convert diplomatic room to manoeuvre into durable economic advantage.
For markets, the key question is whether this balancing act produces outcomes that can be measured in trade, investment and industrial resilience rather than simply in symbolism.
Source: Noah Wire Services