Managing strategic suppliers is not simply a matter of negotiating the lowest possible price. As TechTarget notes, the real task is to recognise which vendors are central to the business, then shape the relationship so it delivers value over time rather than only short-term savings.
The first discipline is segmentation. Josh Nelson of The Hackett Group said companies should keep the definition of “strategic” deliberately narrow, reserving it for suppliers that genuinely hel...
Continue Reading This Article
Enjoy this article as well as all of our content, including reports, news, tips and more.
By registering or signing into your SRM Today account, you agree to SRM Today's Terms of Use and consent to the processing of your personal information as described in our Privacy Policy.
p create an advantage in the marketplace. A supplier may be important, but if it does not help differentiate the business, it should not be treated as strategic. That distinction matters because strategic relationships demand more effort, more internal coordination and more senior attention than ordinary transactional buying.
Clarity is equally important on the supplier side. Nelson argued that firms often decide internally that a supplier is strategic without ever making that position explicit. Yet a relationship only works properly when both sides understand the intent and are willing to commit to it. In some cases, the supplier may not want that label at all, especially if larger customers matter more to its own business or if previous dealings have been difficult.
Defining the objective of the partnership is another essential step. John Wiborg, chief executive of Stellar Industrial Supply, told TechTarget that many companies speak about long-term strategic goals but still end up rewarding staff only on price reduction. That can create a contradiction: teams are encouraged to look for deeper partnership value, yet their incentives pull them back towards lower unit cost. As Wiborg put it, organisations can end up “walking by hundred dollar bills to pick up a few dimes”. His point is that the internal reward structure must match the external ambition.
That alignment has to run across the business as well as between buyer and supplier. Len Riley, chief advisory officer at UpperEdge, said procurement teams should begin by understanding the priorities of internal stakeholders before approaching vendors. If finance, procurement, operations and technology are not working from the same brief, the supplier relationship will quickly become muddled. Shopify similarly stresses the value of clear ownership, structured governance and service-level agreements that reflect actual business risk rather than abstract targets.
When problems arise, the best companies start by examining themselves first. Riley advised against reaching immediately for blame. Instead, firms should consider the history of the relationship, the expectations already in place, whether IT and procurement are working well together, and whether the organisation has been clear enough about what “good” looks like. Strategic partnerships, he suggested, should be treated as evolving relationships, not one-off negotiations.
Regular feedback also matters. Edmonds of Lync Consulting told TechTarget that buyers should periodically ask suppliers what they want to achieve from the relationship and where the buying organisation can help. In some cases, the partnership may deepen beyond the original contract, whether through wider product categories, service expansion or even joint ventures. That kind of collaboration is more likely when both sides see the relationship as mutually valuable rather than purely transactional.
Trust sits at the centre of all of this. Riley said companies need to behave credibly and consistently, while also ensuring they have the right team in the room for complex negotiations. McKinsey has argued in related work that strong governance, clear accountability and defined metrics are what allow strategic partnerships to create new value, especially when senior executives remain involved rather than delegating everything down the chain.
For some suppliers, the right approach may also involve investment. Edmonds said buyers can sometimes strengthen a strategic supplier by helping to improve its capacity or cost base, thereby protecting the supplier’s margin while lowering costs over time for the customer. In an environment where supply chains have been repeatedly tested, that kind of long-term thinking may be the difference between a supplier that merely fulfils orders and one that becomes a genuine competitive asset.
Source: Noah Wire Services
