In the rapidly evolving landscape of supply chain management, the Kraljic Matrix remains a fundamental tool, yet recent discussions suggest it may not be sufficient for modern procurement needs. Originating from Peter Kraljic’s pioneering work published in the Harvard Business Review in 1983, the matrix has traditionally categorised suppliers into four quadrants: non-critical, leverage, bottleneck, and strategic. This classification has guided many companies in developing tailored procurement strategies that enhance efficiency and effectiveness by aligning purchasing approaches with the significance and complexity of different items.
However, as organisations grapple with increasingly complex supply chains and the heightened role of technology, the applicability of the Kraljic Matrix is under scrutiny. In conversations among members of the Procurement Leaders community, particularly within the SRM & Innovation cohort, there has been a notable shift towards enhancing supplier segmentation beyond the traditional framework. A recent example from a consumer goods company highlights an innovative approach, whereby supplier segmentation is based on two new matrices focusing on engagement levels and suppliers’ capabilities for commercial growth, encompassing efficiency, agility, and innovation potential. This evolution seeks to maximise value by recognising that not all supplier relationships require the same level of attention or collaboration.
The proposed segmentation replaces the traditional Kraljic categories with a modern framework that identifies suppliers as transactional, essential, visionary, and strategic. This reflects a more nuanced understanding of supplier relationships where organisations can better allocate their resources and foster the necessary human interaction for suppliers deemed critical to their operational success.
As practitioners consider the future of supplier management, they must ponder how to balance the need for robust supplier relationships with efficiency in management processes. The discussions around these emergent frameworks underscore the importance of evolving procurement strategies to address the complexities of today’s market, which has undergone tremendous transformation, particularly with the rise of digital tools and AI’s potential impact on supplier relations.
To remain competitive, organisations are encouraged to rethink how they segment their suppliers and invest time and resources where they will yield the greatest returns. The shifting paradigms in supplier segmentation not only emphasise the importance of selecting the right approach but also signal a broader transformation in how companies view procurement—not merely as a transactional process but as a strategic conduit for value creation.
In this context, frameworks that are fit for contemporary needs may draw lessons from the Kraljic Matrix while also adapting to accommodate the realities of a modern supply chain. While the Kraljic approach has historically provided a solid foundation, the demand for agility and innovation in procurement practices seems insatiable, highlighting the need for ongoing reevaluation and adaptation of established models to ensure they meet the challenges of 2025 and beyond.
Furthermore, it remains critical for organisations to engage in continuous dialogue about supplier segmentation strategies, ensuring they harness the right capabilities and foster collaborations that pave the way for sustainable growth and innovation in their supply chains.
Reference Map
- Kraljic Matrix Overview
- Historical Context of the Kraljic Matrix
- Evolution of Supplier Segmentation
- Contemporary Applications of the Kraljic Matrix
- Future of Procurement Strategies
Source: Noah Wire Services
Subscribe to Industry Updates
