As freight volumes begin to recover, the pressure on brokers and 3PLs is rising with them. Spot rates have climbed for seven straight months, tender rejections are increasing and available capacity is tightening. That combination is welcome after a softer stretch in the market, but it also exposes weak points in operations. When demand accelerates, teams that are loosely connected tend to break first.
That is why the debate around nearshore support has changed. The most relevan...
Continue Reading This Article
Enjoy this article as well as all of our content, including reports, news, tips and more.
By registering or signing into your SRM Today account, you agree to SRM Today's Terms of Use and consent to the processing of your personal information as described in our Privacy Policy.
t question is no longer whether nearshore labour is cheaper. According to a FreightCaviar poll, 66% of logistics professionals say talent quality matters most when choosing a nearshore partner, while only 7% point to cost competitiveness. In other words, operators are increasingly looking for capability, not just savings.
The distinction between nearshore staff and a true nearshore team is crucial. Staff can fill gaps. A team takes responsibility for results. When nearshore employees are folded into daily communication, given access to the same business context and judged on the same outcomes as in-house colleagues, they begin to operate like part of the business rather than an external layer. If they are left on the edge of the operation, they tend to behave like a vendor: slower to escalate problems, less tied into priorities and less invested in the result.
That matters in freight, where service and communication are already decisive. Barrett Distribution’s research on 3PL selection found that customer service and communication were the leading priorities for brands choosing a logistics partner, ahead of inventory accuracy, speed and technology integration. The message is consistent across the industry: logistics relationships succeed when execution is close, responsive and accountable.
For nearshore models, that means integration has to be deliberate. Daily stand-ups, shared dashboards, the same performance measures and regular exposure to account-level context all help close the gap between locations. The best teams are not defined by geography, but by how well they work inside the same operating rhythm.
Cultural fit is part of that equation too. Freight moves quickly, and the work often depends on direct communication, fast judgement and the confidence to press for answers when a shipment or carrier issue starts to wobble. Nearshore teams that understand those expectations can be highly effective. Those that do not may technically complete tasks, but still miss the operational nuance that keeps customers happy.
Rapido, the company behind the article’s model, says it builds for that kind of alignment from the start, screening for communication style, problem-solving ability and the capacity to work in a fast-paced, relationship-driven environment. It also argues that onboarding should resemble standard employee induction rather than contractor handover, with new hires introduced to mission, values, key accounts and communication standards from day one.
The broader point is that nearshoring works best when it is treated as an operating model, not a headcount workaround. In a market where payroll can account for more than half of operating costs for small and mid-sized brokerages, the temptation is to use nearshore support purely as a cost lever. But the firms most likely to benefit from the current freight rebound will be the ones that use nearshore teams to strengthen execution, improve accountability and scale without weakening control.
In that sense, the winning model is not the cheapest one. It is the one that feels least like outsourcing at all.
Source: Noah Wire Services
