Modernising ageing equipment in the food supply chain does not always mean replacing it wholesale. For many operators, the bigger gains may come from phased upgrades: adding sensors, improving controls, and linking older assets to modern software to reduce waste, downtime and energy use.
That approach is becoming more relevant as food businesses face persistent pressure from higher power costs, tighter safety obligations, climate-related reporting and the need to keep productio...
Continue Reading This Article
Enjoy this article as well as all of our content, including reports, news, tips and more.
By registering or signing into your SRM Today account, you agree to SRM Today's Terms of Use and consent to the processing of your personal information as described in our Privacy Policy.
n moving. According to Schneider Electric, which set out the case for incremental change, many UK operators still depend on legacy machinery that is expensive to run and difficult to monitor properly. The company argues that this makes targeted modernisation more practical than a complete rebuild.
The same logic is echoed across the wider sector. Food Industry Executive has noted that digital change in meat and poultry processing is especially complex because equipment must perform in cold, wet and sanitised environments, which makes planning and installation more demanding. At the same time, Food Processing has argued that the sector can no longer afford to delay digitalisation if it wants to remain competitive.
The case for taking smaller steps is particularly strong in plants where ageing infrastructure is already putting pressure on margins. In dairies, for example, modernisation efforts increasingly centre on automation, connected assets and AI-driven insights to improve resilience and quality, according to Dairy Processing. Elsewhere, industry commentators say digital twins are gaining traction because they allow maintenance teams to model equipment performance, predict faults and make better replacement decisions.
For Schneider Electric, the message is that food producers, processors and distributors can achieve meaningful results without major disruption. Retrofitting connected devices, upgrading software and introducing energy monitoring can reveal inefficiencies quickly, while predictive maintenance can help cut unplanned stoppages. In some cases, older motors and compressors may cost more to operate than modern alternatives, especially when variable speed drives or better temperature controls are added into the mix.
Compliance is another driver. As reporting expectations expand, many companies are being asked to provide more detailed data on emissions, energy use and food safety performance. Legacy systems often make that difficult because manual data collection is slow and inaccurate. Modern operational technology, by contrast, can provide the visibility needed to meet certification and regulatory demands more easily.
The challenge for many businesses is not whether digitalisation has value, but how to introduce it without halting production. Food Industry Executive has reported that phased integration, starting with small proof-of-concept projects, is often more cost-effective and less disruptive than a full system overhaul. That is especially relevant in always-on sites, where downtime is expensive and operational tolerance for risk is low.
The broader industry picture suggests that modernisation is no longer a future ambition but a practical route to resilience. From farms to packaging lines and warehouses, incremental upgrades can improve efficiency now while laying the groundwork for more advanced digital capabilities later. For a sector under pressure to do more with less, that may be the most realistic path forward.
Source: Noah Wire Services
