Sweden faces two intertwined challenges: preparing society for a changing climate and strengthening civilian readiness in a more uncertain world.
These are too often treated as separate policy areas, but in practice they are part of the same task: keeping society functioning under strain. When cloudbursts close roads, heatwaves test energy systems or disruptions affect water supply, the issue is not climate or preparedness. It is resilience.
A new Novus survey commission...
Continue Reading This Article
Enjoy this article as well as all of our content, including reports, news, tips and more.
By registering or signing into your SRM Today account, you agree to SRM Today's Terms of Use and consent to the processing of your personal information as described in our Privacy Policy.
ed by Innovationsföretagen suggests that many municipalities have already understood this. Nearly seven in ten say they are working to integrate climate and preparedness perspectives into planning and development. Yet only a minority say that this work is happening to a large extent. The main obstacles are financial constraints, conflicting objectives and the difficulty of turning long-term ambitions into concrete investment decisions.
That is not surprising. Planning and construction still tend to be dominated by short-term cost considerations, even though decisions on infrastructure, water systems, energy supply and housing shape society’s ability to cope for decades. It is therefore worrying that public procurement so often revolves around the lowest initial price. A country that must withstand both climate disruption and future crises cannot be built on the basis of the cheapest upfront option.
When price becomes the overriding criterion, resilience, innovation and long-term value are easily pushed aside. Yet it is precisely at the earliest stages , in planning, design and project development , that the greatest opportunity exists to create solutions that are robust enough for the future. Involving the right expertise early can help municipalities identify measures that strengthen adaptation, preparedness and economic efficiency at the same time.
The questions public buyers should ask are straightforward: how well will a solution cope with future climate stress? How robust is it if energy or water supplies are interrupted? What costs can be avoided over the full life of a building or facility? Those questions need far more weight when investment decisions are made.
This is also where the broader policy picture matters. According to the OECD’s 2025 survey of Sweden, climate adaptation across sectors is often held back by competing interests and weak channels of communication. Research published in Sustainability has likewise pointed to the central role of municipalities, while also noting that local officials often lack clear guidance and sufficient resources. Earlier academic work reached similar conclusions, arguing that adaptation succeeds best when organisations co-operate rather than operate in silos.
The Swedish government has meanwhile moved to bolster civil defence. In September 2025 it announced a package that includes more funding for healthcare stockpiles, shelter refurbishment, food reserves and preparedness at municipal and regional level. The proposed allocation amounts to SEK 3 billion in 2026, SEK 4.2 billion in 2027 and SEK 4.6 billion in 2028, underlining how seriously the state now views resilience.
That makes the case for a different approach to public investment even stronger. Climate, preparedness and community planning should not be handled as separate tracks, but as parts of one mandate. A housing area, a road or a waterworks does not recognise administrative boundaries. It must work when society is hit by extreme weather, supply disruptions or other crises.
The lesson is clear: future preparedness cannot be bought at the lowest price. It has to be designed in from the start.
Source: Noah Wire Services
