For years, procurement was often reduced to a simple calculation: award the contract to the lowest bidder and call it value. That logic is looking increasingly outdated. Across sectors ranging from facilities management and food services to retail, e-commerce and managed living, organisations are finding that a cheaper quote can conceal higher long-term costs through poor quality, delivery failures, compliance problems, waste and operational disruption.
The shift is being drive...
Continue Reading This Article
Enjoy this article as well as all of our content, including reports, news, tips and more.
By registering or signing into your SRM Today account, you agree to SRM Today's Terms of Use and consent to the processing of your personal information as described in our Privacy Policy.
n by a wider change in business priorities. Supply chains are more volatile, customers are more demanding, sustainability is under closer scrutiny and digital procurement tools are changing how purchasing decisions are made. In that environment, procurement is no longer just a buying function. It is becoming a strategic discipline centred on resilience, performance and long-term value.
A growing body of procurement guidance now argues that the headline price of a product or service tells only part of the story. Total Cost of Ownership, or TCO, looks beyond the invoice to capture acquisition, operating, quality and disposal costs over the full life of a purchase. Industry guides suggest that unit price may account for only a fraction of the true expense, with hidden costs such as freight, rework, working capital, administration and disruption often making up the rest. In some cases, the supplier that appears cheapest at tender stage is not the most economical choice once the full lifecycle is taken into account.
That is the context for a special feature bringing together four senior procurement leaders who each see the same trend from different angles. Ruchita Mishra, Director of Procurement and Supply Chain Management at Sodexo India, argues that organisations need to move beyond fixation on the lowest quote and begin measuring the real cost of their decisions. Dr Sayantan Sinha, Vice-President of Facilities Management and Group Procurement at JMD Group, makes the case for best-value procurement, where technical capability, resilience, sustainability and lifecycle performance matter as much as price.
Dr Priya Malhotra, Vice-President of Procurement and Supply Chain at Stanza Living, shows how procurement can shape resident experience, operational standards and brand perception. Meanwhile Vinayaka Gangavathi, Head of Procurement for Projects and Administration at Innovative Retail Concepts, the operator of BigBasket, brings a retail perspective in which decisions on warehouse infrastructure, packaging and digital procurement platforms can influence efficiency as well as sustainability.
The common thread is clear. Procurement is increasingly judged not by how little it spends at the outset, but by how well it supports the wider business over time. Supplier reliability, quality assurance, ESG compliance, packaging innovation and risk management are all becoming part of the value equation. In many sectors, that means the cheapest option is no longer the smartest one.
What emerges is a more mature view of purchasing: one that treats suppliers as partners, recognises the cost of failure and rewards decisions that strengthen the organisation rather than merely reduce the immediate bill. In that sense, procurement is moving decisively away from lowest cost and towards lasting value.
Source: Noah Wire Services