Many organisations still approach artificial intelligence as though it were chiefly a way to remove people from the process. That is the wrong starting point. The more immediate gains usually come from stripping out routine administrative work that keeps skilled staff away from the tasks that actually require their judgement, experience and relationships.
Over the past two years, many companies have experimented with ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot and similar tools. That has helped...
Continue Reading This Article
Enjoy this article as well as all of our content, including reports, news, tips and more.
By registering or signing into your SRM Today account, you agree to SRM Today's Terms of Use and consent to the processing of your personal information as described in our Privacy Policy.
teams become more familiar with generative AI, but in most cases it has not yet changed the structure of work in a meaningful way. The next phase is less about using AI as a smarter search tool and more about deploying it to carry out work end-to-end.
That shift is already visible in the market. Some firms are moving beyond chat interfaces and building AI agents that can follow operational rules, move data between enterprise systems, read emails, check portals and escalate only the cases that need human attention. The broader point is echoed by commentary from TechRadar, which argues that AI creates the most value when it is embedded into a workflow rather than layered on top of a broken one.
For organisations looking to begin, the sensible move is not to redesign everything at once. It is to choose one repetitive process that is high-volume, rules-based and time-consuming, then automate that first. In many businesses, there are dozens of such tasks hiding in plain sight: supplier follow-ups, invoice comparisons, data entry, inventory checks, status reporting and approval routing.
In supply chain and operations teams, for example, an AI agent could chase late supplier confirmations, reconcile purchase orders with invoices, update ERP records, monitor supplier portals, compile shortage reports, identify stock discrepancies, prepare KPI dashboards, gather transport updates from multiple carriers and draft routine supplier emails. None of that work is a source of competitive advantage. Yet it can absorb hundreds of hours each month.
That is why the better AI programmes are often the unglamorous ones. If a system can reliably remove manual copying, repetitive logging-in and constant spreadsheet maintenance, people can spend more time on supplier management, negotiation, planning, problem-solving and service improvement. In that model, AI handles the routine and humans retain responsibility for judgement.
The argument is also consistent with the direction of enterprise software. TechRadar has noted that AI agents are not ending software-as-a-service, but pushing it into a new phase in which platforms matter less for their user interfaces and more for their ability to control, execute and record automated work. Gartner has predicted that by 2030 most AI spending will be bundled into existing cloud and SaaS services, underlining the idea that automation will increasingly sit inside established business systems rather than outside them.
Specialist vendors are already building around that premise. Platforms such as TheActions and Assistents AI say they are designed to turn standard operating procedures into executable workflows, with approvals, audit trails and escalation logic built in. Career guidance sites tracking the impact of AI on administrative work make a similar point: the technology is steadily taking over drafting, scheduling and document processing, while human value shifts towards coordination, context and relationship management.
That makes transition management critical. Businesses should not remove human oversight too quickly, nor assume that a model trained on a process can safely run unattended from day one. A prudent approach is to test one workflow, measure the benefits in time saved, error reduction, service quality and staff satisfaction, then expand only when the evidence is clear.
Seen that way, transformation becomes a sequence of practical improvements rather than a grand technology exercise. The organisations that will benefit most are those that identify repetitive work early, automate it carefully and use the freed capacity to improve the parts of the business where people still matter most.
Source: Noah Wire Services
