Procurement teams often assume that once a contract is signed, the hard work is done. In practice, the real difficulties usually begin afterwards, when obligations, renewals, pricing terms and supplier performance have to be tracked across scattered systems and conversations.
That is why artificial intelligence is increasingly being used to turn contract management from a largely administrative function into a source of commercial oversight. IBM has argued that AI can convert c...
Continue Reading This Article
Enjoy this article as well as all of our content, including reports, news, tips and more.
By registering or signing into your SRM Today account, you agree to SRM Today's Terms of Use and consent to the processing of your personal information as described in our Privacy Policy.
ontracts into actionable insights by automating drafting, negotiation, execution and monitoring, while also extracting obligations and tracking milestones more consistently. KPMG’s Contract IQ framework makes a similar case, describing contracts as living commercial assets that need continuous monitoring to protect negotiated value and identify performance drift.
The appeal is clear. Procurement teams are not merely trying to store documents; they need to know whether suppliers are delivering on time, whether contract terms are being followed, whether renewals are being missed and whether small pricing leaks are quietly eroding margins. As contract volumes rise, manual tracking through emails, spreadsheets and approval chains becomes harder to sustain.
Industry commentary on procurement KPIs in 2026 suggests that the most useful measures are those tied directly to spend, speed, compliance and supplier reliability. Metrics commonly highlighted include spend under management, procurement cycle time, cost savings, supplier on-time performance, contract compliance and supplier risk scoring. In contract management, legal and procurement-focused KPI lists increasingly add measures such as approval workflow efficiency, clause deviation detection, contract value leakage and obligation fulfilment.
The common thread across these approaches is visibility. AI-driven extraction and analysis can help organisations uncover data that would otherwise remain buried in contract repositories, making it easier to benchmark performance, identify exceptions and recover lost value. Sirion has said this kind of monitoring can reveal value leakage, supplier underperformance and compliance gaps before they become more costly.
For procurement leaders, the practical question is not whether AI can process contracts faster. It is whether it can help teams focus on the measures that matter most: cycle times, compliance, supplier reliability, risk exposure and the recovery of commercial value. In a market where margins are tight and supplier relationships are under constant pressure, those are the numbers that define whether contract management is merely organised or genuinely under control.
Source: Noah Wire Services
