Only a small minority of organisations have managed to extend operational excellence across the enterprise, and that failure is increasingly costly. McKinsey has said roughly 7% of organisations have successfully scaled such mechanisms company-wide, while its research on transformations suggests around 70% fall short because employee engagement is weak and support structures are missing. That backdrop helps explain why spreadsheets, inboxes and isolated workflows are no longer enough ...
Continue Reading This Article
Enjoy this article as well as all of our content, including reports, news, tips and more.
By registering or signing into your SRM Today account, you agree to SRM Today's Terms of Use and consent to the processing of your personal information as described in our Privacy Policy.
for companies trying to turn frontline ideas into measurable gains.
The emerging answer, according to vendors and industry analysts alike, is a shift towards centralised continuous improvement platforms that act as a single system of record. Rather than functioning as a digital suggestion box, these tools are being positioned as decision engines: capturing ideas, eliminating duplicates, routing work automatically and giving executives a clearer view of return on investment. The pitch is that innovation should be managed as a repeatable business process, not as an ad hoc cultural initiative.
Gartner’s latest outlook reinforces the direction of travel. In August 2025, it forecast that 40% of enterprise applications would include task-specific AI agents by the end of 2026, up from less than 5% in 2025. The consultancy argues that these systems will move software beyond passive productivity support and into autonomous workflow orchestration, a trend that is already shaping expectations for idea management, process improvement and enterprise collaboration. Gartner has also said embedded AI in cloud ERP applications will accelerate finance processes, including a projected 30% faster financial close by 2028, showing how deeply AI is expected to penetrate operational systems.
That matters for continuous improvement because the problems most organisations face are rarely about a shortage of ideas. They are about handling volume, judging value and maintaining momentum. Manual methods create delays, obscure ownership and make it hard to prove impact. By contrast, modern platforms promise structured intake, automated triage, deduplication and dashboards that link implemented suggestions to cost savings, waste reduction and other hard metrics. The aim is to keep promising ideas from disappearing into the kind of administrative dead end that kills employee participation.
The build-versus-buy decision is also becoming harder to ignore. Internal development may seem attractive at first, but it can demand substantial upfront investment and ongoing maintenance, particularly as AI capabilities and security expectations change. As enterprise software increasingly shifts towards agentic models, Gartner has warned that up to $234bn of enterprise application spending could be exposed to agentic disruption between now and 2030, underscoring how quickly traditional software economics are changing. In that environment, specialist SaaS platforms have a clear argument: faster deployment, lower technical burden and a better chance of keeping pace with compliance and integration demands.
The most effective implementations are also changing in design. Rather than asking employees for vague suggestions, organisations are more likely to frame targeted innovation challenges around specific bottlenecks. That approach helps focus attention on problems that can be measured and solved, while giving leaders a cleaner line of sight from submission to implementation. Automated workflow stages, mobile access for frontline teams and social features such as voting or recognition are increasingly used to sustain engagement and prevent the morale damage that comes when employees never hear back about their ideas.
ROI remains the real test. Participation numbers may indicate interest, but they do not prove value. Companies that succeed in scaling continuous improvement tend to track both hard returns, such as labour savings and reduced waste, and softer gains, including retention and culture. That distinction is becoming more important as boards and executives ask not just whether people are submitting ideas, but whether those ideas are changing the economics of the business.
For organisations willing to move beyond fragmented processes, the direction is clear. Continuous improvement is no longer simply about encouraging suggestion sharing; it is about building an intelligence layer that can evaluate, prioritise and measure change at scale. In a market where agentic AI is increasingly expected to reshape enterprise software itself, the companies that treat improvement as a data-driven operating discipline are likely to move fastest, and waste least.
Source: Noah Wire Services
