As tariffs become a permanent feature of global commerce, companies are shifting towards diversified sourcing, technological integration, and contractual reconfigurations to safeguard resilience and competitiveness in an evolving trade landscape.
We are witnessing a structural shift in global commerce in 2025–26: tariffs are no longer episodic trade frictions to be absorbed, but a principal driver of corporate strategy and supply‑chain redesign. According to the 202...
Continue Reading This Article
Enjoy this article as well as all of our content, including reports, news, tips and more.
By registering or signing into your SRM Today account, you agree to SRM Today's Terms of Use and consent to the processing of your personal information as described in our Privacy Policy.
6 Global Trade Report from the Thomson Reuters Institute, 76% of trade professionals now regard the new U.S. tariffs as a more permanent feature of the landscape for at least the next four years, and firms are responding by turning trade teams into strategic hubs rather than back‑office administrators.
That reorientation is evident in how companies are reworking where and how they buy. The report finds that 65% of respondents are changing sourcing patterns as their primary mitigation strategy, shifting from single‑country dependence to diversified supplier networks and regional footprints. More than half (51%) say they are either moving or considering moving manufacturing to the United States to lessen tariff exposure, reflecting a marked rise in nearshoring and reshoring activity. “Changes in tariffs cause uncertainty in shipping and procurement, which raises logistical costs and makes maintaining agreements with exporters more difficult”, one respondent said in the Thomson Reuters survey.
Renegotiating supplier contracts has become a parallel priority. Some 57% of trade professionals report plans to revisit contractual terms to clarify who bears tariff risk, lock in prices ahead of new measures, or introduce flexibility clauses that allow for adjustments as policy evolves. Practical approaches include negotiating bulk purchases before tariff changes take effect and establishing fixed‑price arrangements to preserve margin predictability.
Technology adoption is accelerating rapidly as companies seek the visibility and agility manual processes cannot provide. The Thomson Reuters Institute found that 40% of respondents are now exploring emerging technologies such as AI and blockchain, up sharply from 6% the prior year, while 58% have deployed trade and supply‑chain data analytics. Industry commentary and practitioner guides underscore the same point: real‑time visibility, predictive analytics, automated compliance and scenario modelling are central to managing tariff volatility and stress‑testing sourcing options. Forbes and other trade advisers emphasise combining Industry 4.0 tools with financial and operational hedges to stabilise margins while reconfiguring supply chains.
A suite of more technical measures is also in wider use. Nearly half of respondents (46%) report using classification engineering to reduce duty exposure, and 29% are applying origin engineering strategies. Around 39% say they are absorbing tariffs themselves or considering doing so to avoid passing on price increases in sensitive markets. Duty‑deferral mechanisms, including Foreign Trade Zones and Temporary Importation under Bond programmes, are being used or considered by 36% of organisations to defer or eliminate certain liabilities.
These corporate responses sit against diverging macroeconomic assessments. S&P Global Market Intelligence projects a more favourable trade‑policy environment in 2026 than the immediate prior period, even as it estimates tariffs removed roughly $907 billion from analyst profit forecasts since early 2025. By contrast, Allianz Trade warns that tariff volatility has amplified financial and operational risks for exporters, contributing to rising insolvency pressures globally and an uncertain near‑term outlook for some sectors.
Practical trade planning therefore needs to reconcile differing horizons. For many companies, the imperative is dual: implement near‑term measures that protect cash flow and customer prices, while investing in medium‑term resilience, diversified sourcing, contractual rebalancing and tech‑enabled scenario planning, that preserves competitiveness if tariffs persist. Industry practitioners and advisory pieces recommend complementary tools such as the China+1 approach, wider sourcing in Southeast Asia and India, and the use of financial instruments to hedge tariff risk.
The broader picture painted by the Thomson Reuters report and corroborating industry analyses is one of accelerated professionalisation of trade functions. Trade teams are gaining visibility, influence and resources as organisations demand integrated responses that combine procurement, legal, tax and finance. According to Thomson Reuters Institute, the trade professionals best placed to succeed will be those who treat tariff volatility not as a temporary shock but as a catalyst for structural transformation: redesigning supply chains, renegotiating commercial relationships and embedding technology to turn regulatory friction into a source of competitive advantage.
For businesses navigating the coming months, the combination of strategic supply‑chain diversification, sharper contractual protections and targeted technology investment offers the clearest path to resilience. At the same time, corporations must remain alert to improving policy signals flagged by some market analysts, while also preparing for downside scenarios described by trade‑risk forecasters. The most robust strategies will be those that balance short‑term protection with long‑term adaptability.
Source: Noah Wire Services
