A wave of high-profile intrusions in the first half of 2025 — from United Natural Foods and Ukrzaliznytsia to Unimicron — has shown how a single compromised node can ripple across automated logistics networks. Industry leaders say boards must prioritise systemic resilience, demanding SBOMs, stronger vendor controls, CI/CD security and tested contingency plans.
Cyberattacks on global supply chains have moved from a looming concern to an operational reality. In the first half of 2025 a string of high‑profile intrusions — hitting food distribution, rail freight documentation and component manufacturers — exposed how quickly digital weakness at a single node can ripple through complex logistics networks. The pattern is now unmistakable: as logistics become more automated and interconnected, the attackers’ surface area grows, and the stakes for continuity, safety and commerce rise with it.
A cascade of disruptions
On 5 June 2025 United Natural Foods (UNFI), the principal distributor for Amazon‑owned Whole Foods, suffered a cyber‑attack that forced the company to take key IT systems offline and resort to manual workarounds, according to the Financial Times. The incident prompted emergency measures to keep orders moving and fuelled short‑term product shortages on supermarket shelves across North America, highlighting how an assault against a distribution node can quickly translate into visible consumer impact.
Earlier in the year, Ukraine’s state railway operator Ukrzaliznytsia was hit by a large‑scale attack which degraded online ticketing and freight documentation. Reuters reported that the company switched to backup systems and manual procedures, allowing trains to continue running while customer‑facing services were partially restored. The railway’s rapid fallback to contingency processes underlines how advance planning and tested recovery play a decisive role in limiting operational damage.
Manufacturing and component suppliers have not been spared. Cybersecurity reporting shows that Unimicron, a major printed‑circuit‑board maker, acknowledged a ransomware incident affecting its Shenzhen unit in late January and notified regulators while engaging external forensic teams. The attackers publicly claimed large data exfiltrations. Industry observers warn that breaches at electronics suppliers can propagate through the manufacturing ecosystem, slowing production where parts are tightly sequenced.
A rapidly escalating threat environment
The technical mechanisms enabling these outages are textbook supply‑chain warfare: attackers exploit trusted dependencies, build systems, third‑party services and weak credential hygiene to achieve disproportionate impact. Cyber intelligence firm Cyble documented 79 software‑supply‑chain incidents in the first five months of 2025 — a roughly 25% increase on the preceding half‑year — and recorded wide month‑to‑month variability in attack volumes. Cyble’s analysis singles out IT, technology and telecommunications firms as prominent targets, underscoring how an exploit in one vendor can cascade to many buyers.
Market analysts and industry titles are sounding the alarm on scale as well as frequency. Gartner’s projection, cited in CIO magazine, warned that by the end of 2025 some 45% of organisations could have experienced a software‑supply‑chain attack — a striking jump from earlier years — while Cybersecurity Ventures continues to estimate that annual global cybercrime costs could reach roughly $10.5 trillion by 2025. These headline figures are based on compounded loss models and are frequently used to justify accelerated investment in cyber resilience across critical sectors.
Why logistics are attractive targets
Logistics systems concentrate value, data and decisioning. Freight platforms and transportation‑management systems control routing and carrier selection; warehouse‑management systems hold inventory truth; port and terminal operating systems coordinate high‑value cargo flows; ERP and financial interfaces govern payments and contracts. As Meheriar Patel, CTO & Director‑IT at Master Group, told Logistics Insider, “There is no preference and choice for exploits in the logistics vertical; all are vulnerable. But each one has its weak link to be looked at in terms of cyber strengthening.”
Attackers are diverse in motive and method. Ransomware and double‑extortion groups continue to target manufacturing and logistics providers, while state‑linked actors have shown interest in transport and port infrastructure. Criminal groups increasingly combine phishing, social engineering and malware — sometimes augmented by AI‑driven techniques — to compromise developer build environments, open‑source dependencies and third‑party services, gaining broad and persistent access.
The operational and economic consequences are real: shipment delays, frozen warehouses, compromised manifests, and payment fraud all carry direct costs. They also inflict indirect reputational damage and regulatory exposure, which can be harder to quantify but materially affect supply‑chain partners and customers.
From perimeter defence to systemic resilience
Industry responses are shifting from defensive patching to systemic hardening. CIO magazine and other observers emphasise the need to make software supply‑chain security a board‑level priority: inventorying components, generating and verifying software bill‑of‑materials (SBOMs), integrating continuous dependency scanning into CI/CD pipelines, and embedding security practices into developer workflows. Cyble’s guidance echoes this developer‑centric approach and stresses detection controls for build environments and third‑party integrations.
Practical resilience was demonstrated in the Ukrzaliznytsia case: switching to backups and manual processes allowed core operations to continue while IT recovery occurred. Corporate disclosures in the Unimicron incident — notifying the stock exchange and appointing external forensic teams — show how public companies are increasingly treating cyber‑incidents as regulated events that require transparency and controlled remediation.
Yet standardisation remains partial. Anshul Jain, CTO and co‑founder of Roadcast, told Logistics Insider that the common thread across logistics touchpoints is “the reliance on interconnected systems, which creates a vast attack surface. Exploiting trust relationships and vulnerabilities in widely used commercial software, attackers can disrupt entire supply chains, highlighting the need for stronger cybersecurity measures and third‑party risk management.” Businesses, he added, must stop treating suppliers as immutable black boxes and instead demand demonstrable security postures across the vendor ecosystem.
Policy, procurement and practical steps
That demand is translating into practical procurement and technical steps. Larger buyers are insisting on contractual security obligations, periodic third‑party audits, and the use of SBOMs to increase visibility. On the technical side, organisations are accelerating multifactor authentication, privileged‑access controls, network segmentation, immutable backups, and continuous monitoring of anomalies across OT and IT environments.
The industry conversation is also moving toward more coordinated standards and regulatory alignment. Where logistics intersect with critical national infrastructure, governments are increasingly prepared to mandate minimum cyber controls and reporting obligations — a trend that could bring greater consistency but also compliance complexity for global supply chains.
A cultural and financial imperative
The case studies of 2025 demonstrate two parallel truths. First, attackers can and will target the weakest link; second, advance preparation — tested contingency plans, segmented networks, and vendor transparency — materially reduces the damage when intrusions occur. The economic signals are stark: rising incident counts, large‑scale extortion claims, and multi‑trillion‑dollar loss projections are driving both boardrooms and procurement teams to reassess cyber risk in a more systemic way.
For logistics firms the choice is no longer binary between efficiency and security. As the sector digitises further, resilience must be designed in, not bolted on. That means transforming procurement practices, investing in developer‑level controls and operational playbooks, and recognising that every node in a global supply chain is also a potential breach point. Without that shift, the next disruption will not be a surprise — it will be an inevitability.
Source: Noah Wire Services
Subscribe to Industry Updates
