The 2026 Third-Party Logistics Study reveals increasing reliance on long-term collaborations between shippers and 3PLs, yet highlights persistent mismatches in priorities and technological investment as obstacles to realising the full potential of these alliances.
As supply chains grow more volatile and technologically sophisticated, relationships between shippers and third‑party logistics providers are shifting decisively from short‑term transactions to deeper, out...
Continue Reading This Article
Enjoy this article as well as all of our content, including reports, news, tips and more.
By registering or signing into your SRM Today account, you agree to SRM Today's Terms of Use and consent to the processing of your personal information as described in our Privacy Policy.
come‑oriented collaborations. The 2026 30th Annual Third‑Party Logistics Study, led by Penn State’s Dr C. John Langley with NTT DATA and Penske Logistics, documents that transition while identifying where alignment remains incomplete and what tools are being used to lock in longer‑term value.
According to the study, strategic partnerships now represent 55% of total outsourced logistics spend, outstripping both preferred providers and basic transactional suppliers. Yet the language used to describe these ties, “strategic,” “partner,” “trust,” “win‑win”, may overstate their depth: the research finds persistent gaps in what shippers and 3PLs say motivates and sustains strategic collaboration.
On the shipper side, the strongest incentives for deeper ties are coping with supply‑chain disruption and complexity (81%), joint cost optimisation (76%), and digital transformation and systems integration (57%). Providers, by contrast, point to demand for end‑to‑end visibility (61%), the need for customised and value‑added services (61%) and an emphasis on customer experience (56%), alongside shared interest in collaborative cost reduction (56%). This mismatch in priorities helps explain why many arrangements labelled strategic still operate closer to the transactional end of the spectrum.
The study also highlights increased commercial and operational interdependence. A majority of shippers (65%) and 3PLs (62%) have taken part in co‑investment initiatives aimed at operational improvement, and more than half of respondents report stable incumbent relationships: many shippers do not rebid at contract expiry and contracts commonly include guaranteed volumes, flexible termination terms and continuous improvement targets, according to secondary reporting of the study.
Technology is both a driver and a stress point. Industry data cited by the study and by collaborators such as NTT DATA indicate rapid uptake of analytics, automation and artificial intelligence to support visibility, forecasting and real‑time response. Providers see improved information flows as central to creating value, and interest in distributed ledgers such as blockchain is rising as a means to secure an immutable provenance trail. At the same time, the report and partner analyses flag a capability gap: shippers’ expectations for technology‑enabled services sometimes outstrip 3PLs’ current investments, with capital, talent and integration hurdles slowing adoption.
Mechanisms to translate strategic intent into delivery vary. Quarterly business reviews and service‑level agreements are the most widely used governance tools, but 3PLs employ QBRs far more often than shippers (94% versus 68%), reflecting providers’ stronger focus on measuring performance against targets. Service‑level agreements show greater parity (56% of 3PLs and 63% of shippers). Other collaborative constructs, gain‑sharing arrangements, joint steering committees and innovation hubs, are less frequently used and reveal further misalignment: 44% of 3PLs cite gain‑sharing as important while only 16% of shippers do.
The implications are practical. Where objectives, metrics and incentives are poorly aligned, investments in visibility and automation risk yielding limited benefit; where commercial terms support shared upside and flexible problem‑solving, partnerships are better placed to manage tariffs, labour shortages and demand swings. The study stresses that moving beyond labels requires firms to articulate the precise circumstances that warrant strategic engagement, to codify shared goals and to resource the technological and governance mechanisms that turn collaborative intent into measurable improvement.
The 30th‑year study underscores a broader point recognised by consulting partners and industry observers: strategic supplier relationships are now an operational necessity rather than a luxury. But realising their potential will depend on closing the expectation gaps between shippers and providers, accelerating targeted investment in analytics and AI, and embedding contractual and governance structures that reward joint performance. Only then will the professed shift from transactional buying to true partnership deliver sustained, end‑to‑end value across complex global supply chains.
Source: Noah Wire Services
