As AI-driven tools like digital twins and generative models advance supply chain management, industry experts warn that without clear governance and a unified strategic vision, organisations risk misalignment and fragmentation in their pursuit of seamless orchestration.
The term ‘orchestration’ is rapidly gaining traction in supply chain management discourse, emerging as a buzzword that appears frequently in marketing materials, maturity frameworks, and strategic mo...
Continue Reading This Article
Enjoy this article as well as all of our content, including reports, news, tips and more.
By registering or signing into your SRM Today account, you agree to SRM Today's Terms of Use and consent to the processing of your personal information as described in our Privacy Policy.
dels. However, its widespread use belies a troubling ambiguity, as the term carries diverse definitions and drives varying outcomes depending on its interpretation.
A recent exploration of this theme by a supply chain expert critically engages with the concept of the “supply chain orchestrator” as articulated by Edouardo Thieuleux. Thieuleux envisions an AI-augmented manager who optimizes transactional efficiency through data-driven decision-making. While this vision is intriguing, the expert argues that it may be too narrowly focused on operational execution, overlooking the broader complexity and non-linear dynamics inherent in supply chains.
One major concern is governance in AI deployment within supply chains. The term “vibe coding” is used to describe the generation of software code through Large Language Models (LLMs) based on prompts without human review or editing. In large, complex supply chains—such as those with hundreds of material planners globally—this practice without robust oversight risks fragmentation and misalignment. The expert notes that today’s supply chains are fraught with variability, diminished forecastability, and organizational politics, with only a minority of companies achieving true alignment across source, make, and deliver functions. This misalignment poses significant challenges to realizing the vision of seamless orchestration.
Furthermore, the article urges a reconsideration of planning paradigms. Instead of automating existing processes that focus on single-plan linear optimization within operational lead times, it advocates for leveraging digital twins powered by native AI supply chain planning platforms. Such platforms could simulate multiple scenarios and trade-offs across make, source, and deliver decisions dynamically, much like weather models forecasting a hurricane’s path. This approach would enable a shift from rigid batch planning to continuous, bi-directional, and adaptive decision-making, enhancing responsiveness and alignment across the organisation.
The redefinition of supply chain work in the AI era must also embrace a holistic approach rather than isolated role adjustments. Automation and AI-driven decision support tools should not only redefine the planner’s tasks but also reshape leadership and cross-functional roles spanning marketing, sales, and finance. Without clear governance structures and shared definitions of supply chain excellence, multiplying agent-based models risks creating confusion rather than clarity.
These perspectives contrast with commercial developments such as Blue Yonder’s recent launch of their Blue Yonder Orchestrator, a generative AI tool integrated into their Luminate Cognitive Platform. According to CEO Duncan Angove, this orchestration solution synthesizes large language models, cloud data, and prompt engineering techniques to provide predictive insights and actionable recommendations, aiming to help companies quickly access intelligent decisions that optimise their supply chains. Blue Yonder’s tool represents a practical application of AI-driven orchestration, highlighting industry momentum toward integrating generative AI capabilities for smarter supply chain management.
Similarly, SAP has incorporated AI into its Business Network to enhance supply chain orchestration by fostering transparency, collaboration, and customer satisfaction across trading partners. Their AI-driven applications, integrated with ERP systems and adjacent business functions, seek to unify operational processes and enable agile responses to disruptions.
These innovations align with traditional frameworks such as the Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) model, which emphasises “orchestrate” as managing the big picture—setting goals, aligning teams, and ensuring all moving parts work towards a coherent strategy. Yet, as the expert points out, there remains a disconnect between aspirational orchestration models and the entrenched reality of misalignment and fragmented execution in many organisations. The adoption of new digital and AI tools must therefore be paired with a concerted effort to define clear governance and a unified vision of supply chain excellence.
Industry bodies like ASCM face a crucial opportunity to lead this conversation, fostering a cohesive voice to help supply chain leaders rethink work design and governance around orchestration powered by AI. Without this, there is a risk of fragmented one-off solutions that fail to deliver consistent value.
In sum, while AI-driven orchestration holds transformative potential to enhance supply chain decision-making and responsiveness, realising this promise demands more than technology deployment. It requires revisiting underlying assumptions about planning, governance, and organisational roles. By adopting holistic, adaptive, and well-governed approaches—leveraging digital twins and continuous simulation—supply chains can evolve beyond transactional efficiency towards resilient, aligned, and intelligent networks fit for the complexities of today’s global environment.
Source: Noah Wire Services
