As organisations face increasing operational and financial exposures from poorly managed contracts, industry experts advocate for centralised, automated solutions to turn legal agreements from liabilities into resilient assets.
Contracts are intended to define and limit business risk, yet an array of operational and financial exposures frequently originates inside the agreements themselves and grows when those contracts are not actively managed. Failures range from rout...
Continue Reading This Article
Enjoy this article as well as all of our content, including reports, news, tips and more.
By registering or signing into your SRM Today account, you agree to SRM Today's Terms of Use and consent to the processing of your personal information as described in our Privacy Policy.
ine administrative slips to systemic governance weaknesses that surface only under audit or when a supplier fails to deliver.
One of the most common practical hazards is automatic renewal clauses. When organisations lack reliable tracking, renewal windows pass unnoticed and firms can find themselves committed to unfavourable pricing or obsolete terms for extended periods. According to Icertis, poor visibility into contract terms is a leading cause of missed revenue opportunities and overlooked discounts, a problem that compounds as contract volumes rise.
Equally consequential are vague or misunderstood obligations. When responsibilities, service levels and timelines are not clearly communicated to the staff who must perform or monitor them, what begins as uncertainty can escalate into formal disputes. Contracko highlights how obligation-tracking gaps across departments create coordination failures and increase the risk of breaches when no single function assumes ongoing accountability.
Regulatory and internal compliance requirements are often embedded in contract clauses, and complacency can open firms to penalties. Simbo notes that missed deadlines and unclear terms in sectors such as healthcare can trigger financial sanctions, service interruptions and costly renegotiations. Aline adds that inadequate contract records and weak access controls also amplify the risk of data-security and privacy breaches, because contracts frequently contain sensitive information that must be protected.
Supplier performance risk frequently hides in contractual detail. Firms that do not monitor supplier commitments against agreed standards expose themselves to service failures and reputational damage. DealHub warns that such lapses contribute to revenue leakage and erode partner trust, estimating that poor contract oversight can lead to material losses if discounts, credits or price adjustments are not captured and enforced.
Organisational design problems make these legal and commercial risks harder to manage. Contracts commonly sit at the intersection of legal, procurement and operational teams; without defined ownership the document becomes nobody’s active responsibility. Gatekeeper points to the operational chaos and unreliable reporting that result when contracts are fragmented across systems and teams, undermining financial forecasting and audit readiness.
Poor contract visibility also impairs decision-making. Executives who lack a consolidated view of commitments, exposure and renewal timelines make reactive choices that increase duplication, create conflicting obligations and inflate spend. Icertis and Contracko both identify the slow cadence of manual negotiations and disparate repositories as drivers of inefficiency and missed commercial leverage.
Finally, reliance on individuals rather than systems is a brittle approach. People change roles or leave; spreadsheets and memory fail at scale. DealHub and Aline emphasise that structured contract management, centralised repositories, obligation-tracking and role-based access, provides continuity, reduces human error and strengthens security.
Reducing these contract-driven risks requires treating agreements as living assets rather than static files. Industry practitioners recommend centralising contract data, assigning clear ownership, automating alerts for key dates and tracking obligations across departments. The company claims that platforms such as Atamis can convert contracts into operational controls by surfacing renewal dates, flagging non-compliance and making terms searchable; independent vendors and advisory firms cited here similarly advocate automation, standardisation and tighter data governance as foundational fixes.
Unchecked, contract shortcomings seldom manifest as single catastrophic events; they accumulate quietly and then reveal themselves under pressure. Organisations that recognise the contractual origin of many operational and financial exposures and invest in tools, ownership and processes can convert legal documents from sources of risk into instruments of resilience.
Source: Noah Wire Services
