As organisations navigate the complexities of marketing automation, a hybrid approach combining agency expertise with in-house capabilities is gaining prominence for scalable and flexible digital growth.
Marketing automation implementation marks a pivotal phase in digital transformation, converting strategic plans into tangible customer journeys, automated campaigns, and data processes. Deciding how best to implement this—whether through an in-house team, an agency, o...
Continue Reading This Article
Enjoy this article as well as all of our content, including reports, news, tips and more.
By registering or signing into your SRM Today account, you agree to SRM Today's Terms of Use and consent to the processing of your personal information as described in our Privacy Policy.
r a hybrid approach—depends heavily on an organisation’s current marketing maturity, technical infrastructure, and long-term goals.
An in-house approach offers significant control over data and processes, which appeals to organisations with mature digital systems that aim to scale automation across multiple channels or regions. According to industry insights, this method ensures full data ownership since no third party handles sensitive customer information. Moreover, having a dedicated team cultivates long-term expertise as they develop hands-on knowledge of platforms like Salesforce Marketing Cloud or Adobe Campaign. This approach often results in faster iteration cycles because internal teams can test and adapt campaigns promptly without agency coordination. While operational costs after the initial setup are primarily limited to staff salaries, companies should prepare for the high upfront expenses associated with hiring and training specialists. Internal teams may also suffer from a narrower focus, potentially specialising in one platform or channel at the expense of broader, cross-platform proficiency. Complex implementations tend to require longer timelines, partly due to developing custom workflows and governance structures.
Conversely, partnering with a marketing automation agency can accelerate implementation, often bringing campaigns to market within weeks thanks to pre-tested frameworks and seasoned specialists. Agencies typically possess cross-platform expertise, handling tools such as Salesforce, Adobe, Braze, or Bloomreach, and can provide strategic oversight on journey mapping, segmentation, and content personalisation. They also have the advantage of enterprise-level integration capabilities, which is particularly valuable when connecting customer relationship management (CRM) systems, e-commerce, and analytics platforms. However, reliance on an external team means less direct control and ongoing costs from retainers or hourly fees. Moreover, once the agency’s engagement concludes, the internal team might face steep learning curves to manage and maintain the system independently.
Considering these strengths and limitations, many organisations now lean towards a hybrid model, blending agency expertise in setup and architecture with in-house execution and optimisation over time. This approach is especially relevant for complex platforms requiring technical onboarding, such as Salesforce Marketing Cloud or Adobe Campaign, which involve intricate integration and ongoing maintenance. The initial phase typically includes discovery meetings to assess the current environment, identify CRM integration needs, and determine if advanced technologies like message queues or event-driven pipelines are necessary for real-time data exchange.
A data-based comparison of these organisational models reveals that no single approach suits every company. Factors such as company size, budget, industry, and internal capabilities play crucial roles in shaping the decision. Practical tools like decision matrices can help businesses align their choice with growth ambitions and current competencies, ensuring the marketing automation strategy adapts alongside organisational evolution.
Industry thought leaders also highlight the challenges and misconceptions related to both in-house and agency models. For instance, internal CRM managers may underestimate the long-term commitment required for maintaining marketing automation systems, while agencies provide valuable multi-channel expertise but might incur higher ongoing costs. Successful deployment often depends on selecting the right agency that fosters collaboration with the in-house team, ensuring strategic continuity and knowledge transfer.
From a scalability and flexibility standpoint, agencies excel in rapidly adjusting campaign intensity and providing immediate access to advanced enterprise tools. In contrast, in-house teams may initially struggle with scaling but win in cost efficiency over time. Hybrid teams combine these benefits by leveraging external partnerships for expansion phases or testing new channels, while consolidating core competencies internally for sustained control.
The choice between in-house, agency, or hybrid marketing automation implementation is not merely operational but strategic. It necessitates balancing control, cost, expertise, speed, and future flexibility. Businesses aiming for long-term digital growth will benefit most from an approach tailored to their unique context—often the hybrid model—which marries the speed and depth of expert agencies with the responsiveness and vision of internal teams. Such a strategy supports effective governance, ongoing optimisation, and scalable automation while mitigating risks related to platform complexity and capability gaps.
Source: Noah Wire Services
